Moose and Doc

halls.md

Popular

  • Body Mass Index BMI Calculator of Body Mass Index.
  • Breast Cancer Risk Calculator.
  • Ideal Weight Calculations set Ideal Weight goal.
  • Body Surface Area BSA Calculator.
  • Boys and Girls Growth Charts, height and weight.
  • old sitemap,
  • Height and weight charts of average weight of women and men.

 

Using BMI for whats up with overweight children

November 12, 2015 By Dr. Halls

child obesity and BMI

Comments and Key points, about body mass index, of child obesity.

This seems like a good article, and it does discuss child obesity and BMI, but upon closer inspection it was not helpful. It’s key limitation is that it only examined 7-year old children, not other ages.

Talking Moose
Talking Moose
A study of only 7 year olds. There must be a limitation in that.


 
 

It defined "true obesity" as children with body fat percentage (measured by impedence) above the 95th percentile of their sample. This definition may or may not be OK, but it is arbitrary.

Talking Moose
Talking Moose
A study where “true obesity” was not studied, just assumed.


 
 

This study compared BMI thresholds to see which gave the most "sensitivity" for detecting "true obesity" correctly. They compared 2 types of thresholds, which I call type A and type B.

For type A, they quoted a BMI (for 7-year olds) of 19.3 for boys and 19.2 for girls as obesity thresholds, based on the IOTF definition1. These values are quite close to, but slightly lower than- the CDC growth chart BMI values. Unfortunately, the reference they give for IOTF definition1, does not seem to match these values ( 19.3 and 19.2). Instead, that reference1 says 20.63 and 20.51! So I’m just totally confused because I cannot verify which criteria they actually tested for type A. Anyway, they concluded that type A criteria weren’t very good.

For type B, they referred to a UK dataset2,3 of body mass index, and used the 95th percentile BMI threshold value as a BMI obesity threshold. Unfortunately, their article never bothered to actually mention the actual values they used, forcing the reader to have access to the original dataset.

Finally, the study concluded that the best sensitivity and specificity BMI threshold occurred at the 92nd percentile fo the UK BMI dataset. Unfortunately, their article never actually mentioned the actual BMI values of these 92nd percentiles. Incredibly frustrating.

So the reader of the article learns methods but no usable facts about child obesity or BMI. I didn’t post this because it was good. In fact, it’s a weak article when it comes to using the percentiles to set thresholds for judging obesity or body fat percentage.

References

  1. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Body mass index in children worldwide: cutoff points for overweight and obesity. Br Med J 2000; 320:1-6.
  2. Barlow SE, Dietz WH, Obesity evaluation and treatment: expert committee recommendations. Pediatrics 1998; 102:c29
  3. Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA. Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990; Arch Dis Child 1995; 73: 25-29

Hector Hector
I skipped reading the whole thing.


Talking Moose
Talking Moose
Good choice. Crap article.


Dr. Halls Dr. Halls
That’s actually the point. It’s an example of some of the poor quality science that piles up and others build on it


 
 

 

End of page Navigation links: Return to category: Body Mass Index.  or  to Homepage  or  Back to top


 

 

Copyright © 1999–2025 · by Steven Halls, MD · [email protected] ·1-780-608-9141 · Contact, Privacy, Terms